Alonzo Harris and his OKR

What do iconic fictional villains have in common? They always lose in the end. In our Villains of OKR series we will analyze the mistakes in their strategy execution and learn from their failures through an OKRs lens.

“This s***’s chess, it ain’t checkers.” – Alonzo Harris, Training Day

Villain Profile

Corrupt Los Angeles narcotics detective

Mission

Stay alive

OKR

Objective Pay off debt to Russian gangsters Progress 80%
Description A Russian gangster mouthed off to Alonzo in Las Vegas. Alonzo lost his temper and beat the man to death. The gangster’s bosses made him a deal. Pay $1 million by midnight or be hunted down and killed.
KR 1 Ask judges for a warrant to search Roger’s house 100%
KR 2 Storm Roger’s house and steal $1M 100%
KR 3 Kill Roger and stage it to make it appear justifiable in a report 100%
KR 4 Drug partner, Jake Hoyt (Deadline: on the day Roger’s house is searched) 100%
KR 5 Kill Jake Hoyt 0%

Outcome

Alonzo achieved 80% progress on his OKR. He was unable to achieve his objective.

OKR Analysis

When in Rome, do as the Romans do. In Alonzo’s world, the lines between narcotics detectives and drug lords are blurred. Alonzo appears more stereotypical gangster than cop. He uses questionable tactics to keep order in his jurisdiction and justifies his “bad cop” execution as long as criminals get arrested.

On this particular day, Training Day , he takes on a new rookie partner, Detective Jake Hoyt.

At one point during the film, Alonzo says to Jake, “It’s not what you know, it’s what you can prove.” Alonzo highlights an important and maybe not-so-obvious OKR lesson here. In the world of OKRs, we focus on outcomes.

The proof for an OKR owner is found in the measures.

It’s not about what we know, it’s about what we do (tasks) , and how that translates into results (KR progress) . Data is irrefutable. We define our goals upfront and identify the measures we’ll track.

When we reflect on them, we can know if we’ve succeeded or failed. Measures are part of what make this simple framework so powerful. It leaves no room for quibbling.

Consider Alonzo’s OKR. After successfully accomplishing KR 1-4, he left KR 5 — kill Jake Hoyt — for a gang to accomplish. Earlier in the day, Hoyt saves a woman from being sexually assaulted, a loose end that nips Alonzo’s plans at the last minute.

In the scene where Hoyt is about to be killed by the gang, they find a wallet on his body. They recognize it belongs to their female cousin. When they call her to verify and discover Hoyt was telling the truth — Hoyt begging for his life, claiming he saved her from the assault — they decide to release him.

KRs must be meaningful for the folks responsible for driving the objective.

“The way that you arrive at an objective has to be a process that ensures that it is meaningful for the folks responsible for driving that objective. Because if it’s not meaningful for the folks that are responsible for driving that objective, then of course they’re not going to care very much about reporting about it. Of course they’re not going to be engaged with it because it is artificial.” — Blake Thomas, the Director of Engineering at NoRedInk, Dreams with Deadlines, Episode 5: Create high five situations

Alonzo arrived at the objective without this gang’s input. The gang was responsible for KR 5. To them, KR 5 was artificial. Showing mercy to the man who saved their cousin’s life was more meaningful so they relinquished responsibility.

In the end, Hoyt is unable to arrest Alonzo, but takes the $1M and leaves Alonzo without means to pay off the Russian mafia.

Looking to get started with OKRs? Try Gtmhub FREE for 7 days!

Subscribe to our blogGet the latest blog posts delivered straight to your inbox